Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Poltergeist’ at 40: How the Classic Film Changed Haunted House Horror Forever

Published

on

Best Horror Films

Poltergeist was released forty years ago, on June 4, 1982, and successfully earned a spot in the top ten grossing movies of that year. The horror classic, directed by Tobe Hooper with a story by producer Steven Spielberg, earned Academy Award nominations for Best Original Score, Best Sound Effects Editing, and Best Visual Effects. Poltergeist even tested the MPAA, prompting an appeal that bumped its R-Rating to a PG, paving the way for the addition of the PG-13 to the MPAA’s rating system. These distinctions are demonstrative of a gamechanger, but Poltergeist also narratively changed the face of haunted house horror in many ways.

The Freeling family lives in Cuesta Verde, an idyllic planned community in suburban California. Steven Freeling (Craig T. Nelson) is a successful real estate developer working for the company behind the community. His wife Diane (JoBeth Williams) is a stay-at-home mom to their three children, sixteen-year-old Dana (Dominique Dunne), eight-year-old Robbie (Oliver Robins), and five-year-old Carol Anne (Heather O’Rourke). However, shortly after introductions to this quintessential American family in Poltergeist, strange things begin to happen around their house —furniture moves on its own; Carol Anne converses with TV static; and the gnarled tree in the backyard seems to spring to life mid-storm.

Then the paranormal activity goes into hyperdrive, and Carol Anne goes missing.

Poltergeist house haunted

It’s not just the variety of scare tactics employed or the showy, breathtaking effects by Industrial Light and Magic that signals a departure from the haunted house blueprint. It’s in the house itself. Up until this point, horror’s unspoken rule for haunted houses is that the haunting is intertwined with the house’s history. Ghosts represent a tragic or grim past; they’re anchored to the spot where they died, usually in a violent fashion. But Cuesta Verde is a brand-new development. The community is comprised of newly built homes that lack any history.

Enter the iconic lines cried out in anguish by Steve to his boss: “You son of a bitch! You moved the cemetery, but you left the bodies, didn’t you? You son of a bitch, you left the bodies, and you only moved the headstones! You only moved the headstones! Why? Why?”

This unsettling epiphany contains layers. The developer’s greed and corner-cutting in costs set the entire community of Cuesta Verde up for failure at best and peril at worst. The rows of pristine suburban homes could get inundated by paranormal problems that could lead to financial ruin. While Carol Anne’s openness and sensitivity to the other side make her vulnerable to the dark entity called the “Beast,” Poltergeist offers up one simple, unspoken reason why the Freeling home seems to be the only one affected so far by their foundation of dead bodies.

Poltergeist house swimming pool

Their terror begins when they break ground in their backyard to install a swimming pool. It starts right around when Diane notices the contractors catcalling her teen daughter before school. It comes full circle in the climax when the Beast unleashes a full-scale bid for Carol Anne and traps Diane in a muddied pool of emerging corpses. Rot hides beneath the idyllic suburban life.

Poltergeist isn’t the first haunted house nestled in the suburbs, but it is an innovator in widening the scope of fear. There’s no bargain deal on a sprawling estate here; a haunting could occur anywhere for any reason. Even that brand-new construction nestled in a bustling middle-class neighborhood.

Tobe Hooper and Steven Spielberg captured the anxieties of suburban parenthood, bringing the horror closer to home than ever before. Its ghosts resembled something far more monstrous, and they preyed upon deeply personal fears.

In Cuesta Verde, conventional hauntings aren’t possible. Instead, Poltergeist widens the scope and scale and latches its malevolent spirit onto a young girl unable to escape its grip. A haunted house is only the beginning of Carol Anne’s nightmare. That unique approach was – and still remains – a gamechanger for haunted house horror.

[Related] Mediums, Mothers, and the Miraculous Women of ‘Poltergeist’

Poltergeist house

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements

Published

on

Bloodlust: Subspecies III

The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.

However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.

That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.

A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.

At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.

The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.

In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.

Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.

The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.

In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.

The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.

Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.

Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.

Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.

Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

Continue Reading