Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Poltergeist’ at 40: How the Classic Film Changed Haunted House Horror Forever

Published

on

Best Horror Films

Poltergeist was released forty years ago, on June 4, 1982, and successfully earned a spot in the top ten grossing movies of that year. The horror classic, directed by Tobe Hooper with a story by producer Steven Spielberg, earned Academy Award nominations for Best Original Score, Best Sound Effects Editing, and Best Visual Effects. Poltergeist even tested the MPAA, prompting an appeal that bumped its R-Rating to a PG, paving the way for the addition of the PG-13 to the MPAA’s rating system. These distinctions are demonstrative of a gamechanger, but Poltergeist also narratively changed the face of haunted house horror in many ways.

The Freeling family lives in Cuesta Verde, an idyllic planned community in suburban California. Steven Freeling (Craig T. Nelson) is a successful real estate developer working for the company behind the community. His wife Diane (JoBeth Williams) is a stay-at-home mom to their three children, sixteen-year-old Dana (Dominique Dunne), eight-year-old Robbie (Oliver Robins), and five-year-old Carol Anne (Heather O’Rourke). However, shortly after introductions to this quintessential American family in Poltergeist, strange things begin to happen around their house —furniture moves on its own; Carol Anne converses with TV static; and the gnarled tree in the backyard seems to spring to life mid-storm.

Then the paranormal activity goes into hyperdrive, and Carol Anne goes missing.

Poltergeist house haunted

It’s not just the variety of scare tactics employed or the showy, breathtaking effects by Industrial Light and Magic that signals a departure from the haunted house blueprint. It’s in the house itself. Up until this point, horror’s unspoken rule for haunted houses is that the haunting is intertwined with the house’s history. Ghosts represent a tragic or grim past; they’re anchored to the spot where they died, usually in a violent fashion. But Cuesta Verde is a brand-new development. The community is comprised of newly built homes that lack any history.

Enter the iconic lines cried out in anguish by Steve to his boss: “You son of a bitch! You moved the cemetery, but you left the bodies, didn’t you? You son of a bitch, you left the bodies, and you only moved the headstones! You only moved the headstones! Why? Why?”

This unsettling epiphany contains layers. The developer’s greed and corner-cutting in costs set the entire community of Cuesta Verde up for failure at best and peril at worst. The rows of pristine suburban homes could get inundated by paranormal problems that could lead to financial ruin. While Carol Anne’s openness and sensitivity to the other side make her vulnerable to the dark entity called the “Beast,” Poltergeist offers up one simple, unspoken reason why the Freeling home seems to be the only one affected so far by their foundation of dead bodies.

Poltergeist house swimming pool

Their terror begins when they break ground in their backyard to install a swimming pool. It starts right around when Diane notices the contractors catcalling her teen daughter before school. It comes full circle in the climax when the Beast unleashes a full-scale bid for Carol Anne and traps Diane in a muddied pool of emerging corpses. Rot hides beneath the idyllic suburban life.

Poltergeist isn’t the first haunted house nestled in the suburbs, but it is an innovator in widening the scope of fear. There’s no bargain deal on a sprawling estate here; a haunting could occur anywhere for any reason. Even that brand-new construction nestled in a bustling middle-class neighborhood.

Tobe Hooper and Steven Spielberg captured the anxieties of suburban parenthood, bringing the horror closer to home than ever before. Its ghosts resembled something far more monstrous, and they preyed upon deeply personal fears.

In Cuesta Verde, conventional hauntings aren’t possible. Instead, Poltergeist widens the scope and scale and latches its malevolent spirit onto a young girl unable to escape its grip. A haunted house is only the beginning of Carol Anne’s nightmare. That unique approach was – and still remains – a gamechanger for haunted house horror.

[Related] Mediums, Mothers, and the Miraculous Women of ‘Poltergeist’

Poltergeist house

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading